The Impact of Gratifications on the Adoption of Immersive Journalism: A Meta-analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152/RCR.V13.7Keywords:
Immersive Journalism, Uses and Gratifications, Adoption Behavior, Generation Z, Meta-analysisAbstract
This paper investigates the role of gratifications in the adoption of immersive journalism and examines how various factors influence audience engagement. This study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines for meta-analysis, analyzing 20 quantitative studies (N = 1,598) retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus between 2017 and 2024. The research quantifies the relationship between uses and gratifications theory and user adoption of immersive journalism, as well as the moderating factors at play. ATLAS.ti 9 facilitated literature screening and coding, while Stata MP 17 computed effect sizes. The findings reveal that gratifications such as emotional involvement, interactivity, and a heightened sense of presence significantly enhance the adoption of immersive journalism. However, these effects are moderate (d = 0.69). The analysis also highlights that audience age, particularly Generation Z, strongly moderates adoption behavior, as younger audiences are more likely to embrace new technology and engage with immersive experiences. However, the complex nature of immersive media poses challenges in information processing, potentially hindering its adoption. This study underscores the need for future research on the evolving role of immersive journalism in media development and its broader implications for communication and storytelling in the digital age.
References
Adelowotan, M. (2021). Software, method, and analysis: Reflections on the use of ATLAS. ti in a doctoral research study. Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, 9(3), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.15604/ejef.2021.09.03.004
Aitamurto, T., Aymerich-Franch, L., Saldivar, J., Kircos, C., Sadeghi, Y., & Sakshuwong, S. (2022). Examining augmented reality in journalism: Presence, knowledge gain, and perceived visual authenticity. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1281-1302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820951925
Ajmain, T. (2020). Impacts and effective communication on Generation Z in industrial revolution 4.0 era. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic, 1(2), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.36655/jetal.v1i2.204
Alzub, A. M. (2023). Navigating the disruption of digital and conventional media in changing media consumption landscape in digital era. Journal of Engineering, Technology, and Applied Science (JETAS), 5(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.36079/lamintang.jetas-0501.517
Barnidge, M., Sherrill, L. A., Kim, B., Cooks, E., Deavours, D., Viehouser, M., . . . Zhang, J. (2022). The effects of virtual reality news on learning about climate change. Mass Communication and Society, 25(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1362/147539214X14024779483591
Bartosik-Purgat, M., & Rakowska, W. (2024). Gender in acceptance of augmented reality in e-commerce: An international perspective. International Entrepreneurship Review, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.15678/IER.2024.1004.08
Borenstein, M. (2009). Effect sizes for continuous data. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (2nd ed., pp. 221-235). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
Bujic, M., & Hamari, J. (2020). Satisfaction and willingness to consume immersive journalism: Experiment of differences between VR, 360 video, and article. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Academic Mindtrek (pp. 120-125). https://doi.org/10.1145/3377290.3377310
Bujić, M., Salminen, M., & Hamari, J. (2023). Effects of immersive media on emotion and memory: An experiment comparing article, 360-video, and virtual reality. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 179, 103118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103118
Canet, F., & Pérez-Escolar, M. (2023). Research on prosocial screen and immersive media effects: A systematic literature review. Annals of the International Communication Association, 47(1), 20-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2022.2130810
Cochran, W. G. (1954). Some methods for strengthening the common X2 tests. Biometrics, 10(4), 417-451. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001616
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Cumming, G. (2013). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807002
Cummings, J. J., Tsay-Vogel, M., Cahill, T. J., & Zhang, L. (2022). Effects of immersive storytelling on affective, cognitive, and associative empathy: The mediating role of presence. New Media & Society, 24(9), 2003-2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820986816
de la Peña, N., Weil, P., Llobera, J., Spanlang, B., Friedman, D., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2010). Immersive journalism: Immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 19(4), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00005
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629-634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
Eskiadi, I. G., & Panagiotou, N. (2024). Embracing immersive journalism: Adoption and integration by news media producers. Journalism and Media, 5(4), 1494-1508. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia5040093
Fraustino, J. D., Lee, J. Y., Lee, S. Y., & Ahn, H. (2018). Effects of 360 video on attitudes toward disaster communication: Mediating and moderating roles of spatial presence and prior disaster media involvement. Public Relations Review, 44(3), 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.02.003
Gao, B. (2023). A uses and gratifications approach to examining users’ continuance intention towards smart mobile learning. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02239-z
Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003
Goulet, J. A., & Smith, I. F. (2013). Structural identification with systematic errors and unknown uncertainty dependencies. Computers & Structures, 128, 251-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2013.07.009
Goutier, N., De Haan, Y., De Bruin, K., Lecheler, S., & Kruikemeier, S. (2021). From “cool observer” to “emotional participant”: The practice of immersive journalism. Journalism Studies, 22(12), 1648-1664. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1956364
Grassini, S., & Laumann, K. (2020). Are modern head-mounted displays sexist? A systematic review on gender differences in HMD-mediated virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1604. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01604
Grassini, S., Laumann, K., & Luzi, A. K. (2021). Association of individual factors with simulator sickness and sense of presence in virtual reality mediated by head-mounted displays (HMDs). Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 5(3), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti5030007
Greber, H. (2024). The effect of interactivity in immersive journalism on participating in the media and through the media. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990241271089
Greber, H., Aaldering, L., & Lecheler, S. (2023). The worthwhileness of immersive journalism—Taking on an audience perspective. Journalism Practice, 19(1), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2023.2177711
Hazarika, A., & Rahmati, M. (2023). Towards an evolved immersive experience: Exploring 5G-and beyond-enabled ultra-low-latency communications for augmented and virtual reality. Sensors, 23(7), 3682. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23073682
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998). Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 486. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Escobar Díaz, C. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2020). Educational experiences with Generation Z. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14(3), 847-859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9
Hernández-Rodríguez, J. C., & García-Perdomo, V. (2023). I enjoy 360 video news more, but understand them less! Gratification gained in virtual reality journalism research. Cuadernos. Info, 56, 313-333. https://doi.org/10.7764/cdi.56.60193
Herrera Damas, S., & Benítez de Gracia, M. J. (2022). Immersive journalism: Advantages, disadvantages and challenges from the perspective of experts. Journalism and Media, 3(2), 330-347. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia3020024
Heyndels, S. (2023). Technology and neutrality. Philosophy & Technology, 36, 75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00672-1
Higgins, J. P., & Thompson, S. G. (2002). Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1539-1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
Isa, A. M., Mahmud, W. A. W., & Sulaiman, W. I. W. (2020). The combining of intrinsic and extrinsic motives for employing OTT media and comprehending the audience’s gratification in Malaysia. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 36(3), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2020-3603-16
Kang, S., Dove, S., Ebright, H., Morales, S., & Kim, H. (2021). Does virtual reality affect behavioral intention? Testing engagement processes in a K-Pop video on YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior, 123, 106875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106875
Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications research. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509-523. https://doi.org/10.1086/268109
Kim, J., & Lee, K. H. (2018). Influences of motivations and lifestyles on intentions to use smartphone applications. International Journal of Advertising, 37(3), 385-401. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2016.1246510
Kim, Y., & Lee, H. (2022). User acceptance of 360-degree video news: An integrated model of extended TAM and U&G perspectives. Communication Research and Practice, 8(4), 327-346. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2022.2141861
Mabrook, R., & Singer, J. B. (2019). Virtual reality, 360 video, and journalism studies: Conceptual approaches to immersive technologies. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2096-2112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1568203
Machfud, M. A., Laksmi, A. A., & Hong, T. (2024). Factors influencing young audience preferences for digital platforms in Indonesia. Vokasi Unesa Bulletin of Engineering, Technology and Applied Science, 1(2), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.26740/vubeta.v1i2.35989
Mehmetoglu, M., & Jakobsen, T. G. (2022). Applied statistics using stata: A guide for the social sciences. London, UK: SAGE.
Narciso, D., Bessa, M., Melo, M., Coelho, A., & Vasconcelos-Raposo, J. (2019). Immersive 360° video user experience: Impact of different variables in the sense of presence and cybersickness. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0581-5
Nielsen, S. L., & Sheets, P. (2021). Virtual hype meets reality: Users’ perception of immersive journalism. Journalism, 22(10), 2637-2653. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919869399
Nowak, G. J., Evans, N. J., Wojdynski, B. W., Ahn, S. J. G., Len-Rios, M. E., Carera, K., . . . McFalls, D. (2020). Using immersive virtual reality to improve the beliefs and intentions of influenza vaccine avoidant 18-to-49-year-olds: Considerations, effects, and lessons learned. Vaccine, 38(5), 1225-1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.11.009
Oliveira, W., Hamari, J., Ferreira, W., Pastushenko, O., Toda, A., Toledo Palomino, P., & Isotani, S. (2023). Uncovering associations between users’ behaviour and their flow experience. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2023.2276822
Oliver, M. B., & Raney, A. A. (2011). Entertainment as pleasurable and meaningful: Identifying hedonic and eudaimonic motivations for entertainment consumption. Journal of Communication, 61(5), 984-1004. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01585.x
Pérez-Seijo, S., Vicente, P. N., & López-García, X. (2022). Immersive journalism: The effect of system immersion on place illusion and co-presence in 360-degree video reporting. Systems, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11010001
Picchio, M. (2023). Meta-analysis. In Handbook of labor, human resources and population economics (pp. 1-29). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6_350-1
Pimentel, D., Kalyanaraman, S., Lee, Y. H., & Halan, S. (2021). Voices of the unsung: The role of social presence and interactivity in building empathy in 360 video. New Media & Society, 23(8), 2230-2254. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444821993124
Pjesivac, I., Ahn, S. J., Briscoe, A., & Kim, S. (2022). 360 journalism as a gateway to information seeking: The role of enjoyment and spatial presence. Journalism Practice, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2022.2059545
Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64(4), 878-912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079
Rosenthal, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2001). Meta-analysis: Recent developments in quantitative methods for literature reviews. Annual Review Of Psychology, 52(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.59
Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication & Society, 3(1), 3-37. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0301_02
Sánchez Laws, A. L. (2020). Can immersive journalism enhance empathy?. Digital Journalism, 8(2), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1389286
Sanchez-Acedo, A., Carbonell-Alcocer, A., Gertrudix, M., & Rubio-Tamayo, J. L. (2023). Metaverse and extended realities in immersive journalism: A systematic literature review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 7(10), 96. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti7100096
Sarkis-Onofre, R., Catalá-López, F., Aromataris, E., & Lockwood, C. (2021). How to properly use the PRISMA Statement. Systematic Reviews, 10, 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01671-z
Sherry, J. L. (2004). Flow and media enjoyment. Communication Theory, 14(4), 328-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00318.x
Su, Y. (2023). The age factor and the acceptance: A rhetorical study on the older audience of the COVID-19 popular science animated films. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 197-213). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34917-1_15
Suh, A., Wang, G., Gu, W., & Wagner, C. (2018). Enhancing audience engagement through immersive 360-degree videos: An experimental study. In Augmented Cognition: Intelligent Technologies: 12th International Conference, AC 2018 (pp. 425-443). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91470-1_34
Sundar, S. S., Kang, J., & Oprean, D. (2017). Being there in the midst of the story: How immersive journalism affects our perceptions and cognitions. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(11), 672-682. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0271
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
Tamborini, R., Bowman, N. D., Eden, A., Grizzard, M., & Organ, A. (2010). Defining media enjoyment as the satisfaction of intrinsic needs. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 758-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01513.x
Van Damme, K., All, A., De Marez, L., & Van Leuven, S. (2019). 360 video journalism: Experimental study on the effect of immersion on news experience and distant suffering. Journalism Studies, 20(14), 2053-2076. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1561208
Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). News as discourse. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203062784
Vettehen, P. H., Wiltink, D., Huiskamp, M., Schaap, G., & Ketelaar, P. (2019). Taking the full view: How viewers respond to 360-degree video news. Computers in Human Behavior, 91, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.018
Weber, W., Dingerkus, F., Fabrikant, S. I., Zampa, M., West, M., & Yildirim, O. (2022). Virtual reality as a tool for political decision-making? An empirical study on the power of immersive images on voting behavior. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 842186. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.842186
Wu, H., Cai, T., Luo, D., Liu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2021). Immersive virtual reality news: A study of user experience and media effects. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 147, 102576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102576
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The philosophy of the journal is to be open and to make all articles accessible. It is our belief that open access is a must in the future of science.
Authors who publish with RCR accept a slightly modified Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
You, as author, retain the copyrights for your paper, but the Review of Communication Research is granted exclusivity for publication of the article. The agreement allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal. We do not want third parties to make a commercial use of the article, unless we agree it with authors.
The journal will run an open review process as well as a traditional peer review process.
When the manuscript is accepted for publication, it will get a doi number and get available online to facilitate early citation.
The journal will post the published article to many public repositories for further diffusion and permanence.
You, as author, are permitted and encouraged to post your work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on your website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
If you have any doubts, please, contact the editor: editor@rcommunication.org
Many thanks for submitting your work to this journal.
