Digital Labor on TikTok and Douyin Platforms: A Scoping Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52152/RCR.V13.15Keywords:
Digital Labor, Mobile Platform, TikTok, Douyin, Scoping ReviewAbstract
The rapid, geographically dispersed uptake of TikTok and Douyin in past years has been coupled with “platformization” where platforms rise with an infrastructural, economic, and cultural model that permeates various economic sectors and living spaces. App users, who not only consume but also produce content, constitute a new form of “digital labor”. This scoping review responds to the rising interest in theorizing short-form video digital labor by consolidating recent research. We constructed an original database of articles published from 2016 to 2022 about TikTok/Douyin across eight databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, EBSCO Communication Source, PsycINFO) with two gray literature platforms (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO’s International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). After identifying “digital labor” related papers in this database, we added publications from 2023 to 2025 on this topic from Google Scholar; 17 papers were analyzed. This scoping review identified six categories of “digital labor” (i.e., creative, visibility, emotional, platform, relational, and promotional) on TikTok/Douyin for elucidation and comparison. Summarizing the papers, we found the goals and situations (precarity/exploitation) of these digital laborers, and their practice performed on TikTok/Douyin to be concurrently discussed. Digital laborers on short-form video apps gravitate to four forms of capital (economic, social, cultural, and symbolic) to achieve personal value. Nevertheless, the platforms’ labor practices employ strategies that subject users to precarity. As these two platforms continue to evolve (and other platforms integrate short-form videos in systems), this review provides a conceptual roadmap for future research about digital labor on networked mobile platforms.
References
Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with influencers’ fashion brands and# OOTD advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86-100.
Abidin, C. (2021). Mapping internet celebrity on TikTok: Exploring attention economies and visibility labours. Cultural Science Journal, 12(1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.140
Abidin, C., & Lee, J. (2023). K-pop TikTok: TikTok’s expansion into South Korea, TikTok Stage, and platformed glocalization. Media International Australia, 188(1), 86-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X231186445
Ardiana, E., & Ananda, A. (2022). The effect of using the TikTok application as a learning media on the activeness and learning outcomes of class XI social sciences students in sociology subjects at SMA N 1 Ampek Angkek. LANGGAM: International Journal of Social Science Education, Art and Culture, 1(02), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.24036/langgam.v1i02.13
Basch, C. H., Hillyer, G. C., & Jaime, C. (2022). COVID-19 on TikTok: Harnessing an emerging social media platform to convey important public health messages. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 34(5), 367-369.
Basch, C. H., Meleo-Erwin, Z., Fera, J., Jaime, C., & Basch, C. E. (2021). A global pandemic in the time of viral memes: COVID-19 vaccine misinformation and disinformation on TikTok. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 17(8), 2373-2377.
Baym, N. K. (2015). Connect with your audience! The relational labor of connection. The Communication Review, 18(1), 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2015.996401
Bourdieu, P. (1983). Economic capital, cultural capital, social capital. Soziale-Welt, Supplement, 2(13), 183-198.
Bourdieu, P. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7(1), 14-25.
Callahan, J. L., & McCollum, E. E. (2016). Obscured variability: The distinction between emotion work and emotional labor. In Managing emotions in the workplace (pp. 219-231). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Chen, Q., Min, C., Zhang, W., Ma, X., & Evans, R. (2021). Factors driving citizen engagement with government TikTok accounts during the COVID-19 pandemic: Model development and analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(2), e21463. https://doi.org/10.2196/21463
Chen, Y. (2014). Production cultures and differentiations of digital labour. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(2), 648-667. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v12i2.547
Duan, S., Lin, J., & van Dijck, J. (2023). Producing new farmers in Chinese rural live E-commerce: platformization, labor, and live E-commerce sellers in Huaiyang. Chinese Journal of Communication, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17544750.2023.2203939
Duffy, B. E., & Meisner, C. (2023). Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in)visibility. Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221111923
Duffy, B. E., & Wissinger, E. (2017). Mythologies of creative work in the social media age: Fun, free, and “just being me”. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4652-4671.
Duffy, B. E., Pinch, A., Sannon, S., & Sawey, M. (2021). The nested precarities of creative labor on social media. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021368
Fiers, F. (2023). Inequality and discrimination in the online labor market: A scoping review. New Media & Society, 25(12), 3714-3734. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021368
Fisher, E. (2012). How less alienation creates more exploitation? Audience labour on social network sites. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 10(2), 171-183.
Fuchs, C. (2014a). Digital labour and Karl Marx. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Fuchs, C. (2014b). Thomas Piketty’s Book “Capital in the Twenty-First Century”, Karl Marx and the Political Economy of the Internet. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 12(1), 413-430.
Fuchs, C. (2015). Dallas Smythe Today–The audience commodity, the digital labour debate, Marxist political economy and critical theory. Prolegomena to a digital labour theory of value. In Marx and the Political Economy of the Media (pp. 522-599). https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291416_019
Fuchs, C., & Sevignani, S. (2013). What is digital labour? What is digital work? What’s their difference? And why do these questions matter for understanding social media? tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique, 11(2), 237-293. https://doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.461
Fung, A., He, W., & Cao, S. (2023). Cultural capitals and creative labour of short video platforms: A study of wanghong on Douyin. Cultural Trends, 32(3), 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2022.2082862
Fung, A., Ismangil, M., He, W., & Cao, S. (2022). If I’m not Streaming, I’m not Earning: Audience relations and platform time on Douyin. Online Media and Global Communication, 1(2), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1515/omgc-2022-0001
Gandini, A. (2021). Digital labour: An empty signifier?. Media, Culture & Society, 43(2), 369-380.
Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738
Glatt, Z. (2021). We’re all told not to put our eggs in one basket: Uncertainty, precarity and cross-platform labor in the online video influencer industry. International Journal of Communication, 16, 1-19. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/15761
He, G., Leurs, K., & Li, Y. (2022). Researching motherhood in the age of short videos: Stay-at-home mothers in China performing labor on Douyin. Media and Communication, 10(3), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5510
Helmond, A. (2015). The platformization of the web: Making web data platform ready. Social Media+ Society, 1(2), 2056305115603080. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305115603080
Hochschild, A. R. (1979). Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 85(3), 551-575. https://doi.org/10.1086/227049
Hochschild, A. R. (1990). Ideology and emotion management: A perspective and path for future research. Research agendas in the sociology of emotions, 117, 117-142.
Hurley, Z. (2023). Dubailiving and digital placemaking on TikTok: Migrant, domestic, and service workers’ affective social mediascapes. Social Media + Society, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231196897
Iqbal, M. (2024, February 22). TikTok revenue and usage statistics (2024). Retrieved from https://www.businessofapps.com/data/tik-tok-statistics/
Jaramillo-Dent, D., Alencar, A., & Asadchy, Y. (2022). Precarious Migrants in a Sharing Economy|# Migrantes on TikTok: Exploring Platformed Belongings. International Journal of Communication, 16, 5578-5602.
Jiang, X. (2023). Performing Eurasianness, Chineseness, and cosmopolitanism as racialized digital labor: Sharenting mixed-blood children on Douyin. Information, Communication & Society, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2023.2216767
Joiner, R., Mizen, E., Pinnell, B., Siddique, L., Bradley, A., & Trevalyen, S. (2023). The effect of different types of TikTok dance challenge videos on young women’s body satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 147, 107856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107856
Kanthawala, S., Cotter, K., Foyle, K., & DeCook, J. R. (2022). It’s the methodology for me: A systematic review of early approaches to studying TikTok. In Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3105-3121). Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10125/79716
Li, Y., Guan, M., Hammond, P., & Berrey, L. E. (2021). Communicating COVID-19 information on TikTok: A content analysis of TikTok videos from official accounts featured in the COVID-19 information hub. Health Education Research, 36(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyab010
Liu, N., & Wang, R. (2022). From disembedding to digital Re-embedding: Social media empowerment and solidarity practices of Chinese truck drivers. Social Media + Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221108409
Losh, E. (2023). Are You the Main Character? Visibility Labor and Attributional Practices on TikTok. In Proceedings of the 34th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (pp. 1-5). https://doi.org/10.1145/3603163.3609049
Martini, L. K. B., Suardhika, I. N., & Dewi, L. K. C. (2022). Tik Tok as a promotional media to influence consumer purchase decisions. Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 20(1), 170-180.
Marx, K. (1990). Capital (volume 1, B. Fowkes, Trans.). London, UK: Penguin Classics.
McCammon, M., & Lingel, J. (2022). Situating dead-and-dying platforms: technological failure, infrastructural precarity, and digital decline. Internet Histories, 6(1-2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701475.2022.2071395
McCashin, D., & Murphy, C. M. (2023). Using TikTok for public and youth mental health–A systematic review and content analysis. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 28(1), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045221106608
Mekler, A. (2021). The effects of TikTok use on college student learning. Undergraduate Review, 16(1), 145-153. https://vc.bridgew.edu/undergrad_rev/vol16/iss1/19
Meliawati, T., Gerald, S. C., & Aruman, A. E. (2023). The effect of social media marketing Tiktok and product quality towards purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Sciences, 8(1), 77-92.
Munn, Z., Peters, M. D., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x
Oladipo, T. (2024, November 4). 20+ Top Social Media Sites and Platforms to Grow Your Brand in 2025. Retrieved from https://buffer.com/resources/social-media-platforms/#5-tiktok
Page, M. J., & Moher, D. (2017). Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: A scoping review. Systematic Reviews, 6, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8
Poell, T., Nieborg, D., & van Dijck, J. F. T. M. (2019). Concepts of the digital society: Platformisation. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425
QuestMobile Research Institute. (2023, February 21). 2022 China Mobile Internet Annual Report. Retrieved from https://www.questmobile.com.cn/research/report/1627881652360417282
Ren, Q. (2021). Multimodal framing COVID-19 stories: The case of Douyin. Mobile Storytelling in An Age of Smartphones, 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87247-2_6
Simpson, E., & Semaan, B. (2023, April). Rethinking creative labor: A sociotechnical examination of creativity & creative work on TikTok. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580649
Standing, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.
Terranova, T. (2012). Free labor. In Digital Labor (pp. 33-57). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., . . . Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169(7), 467-473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850
van Dijck, J., Poell, T., & De Waal, M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford, UK: Oxford university press.
van Kampen, K., Laski, J., Herman, G., & Chan, T. M. (2022). Investigating COVID-19 vaccine communication and misinformation on tiktok: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Infodemiology, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/38316
Vesnić-Alujević, L., & Murru, M. F. (2016). Digital audiences disempowerment: Participation or free labour. Participations: Journal of Audience and Reception Studies, 13(1), 422-430.
Wang, Y. (2020). Humor and camera view on mobile short-form video apps influence user experience and technology-adoption intent, an example of TikTok (DouYin). Computers in human behavior, 110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106373
Xinhua Agency. (2018, July 17). Chinese video sharing app boasts 500 mln monthly active users. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2018-07/17/c_137330644.htm
Yang, X. (2021, October). The emotional labor in the interaction of mobile game live streaming on Douyin. In 2021 6th International Conference on Modern Management and Education Technology (MMET 2021) (pp. 98-106). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211011.019
Ye, Z., Dong, C., & Kavka, M. (2023). Navigating the economy of ambivalent intimacy: Gender and relational labour in China’s livestreaming industry. Feminist Media Studies, 23(7), 3384-3400. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2022.2112736
Zhang, M., & Liu, Y. (2024). Struggle over visibility on Douyin: How transnational influencers who create content about Myanmar strategically negotiate the cybercriminal identity. Convergence. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565241303318
Zheng, C. (2023). Research on the flow experience and social influences of users of short online videos. A case study of DouYin. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 3312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30525-y
Zhou, M., & Liu, S. D. (2021). Becoming precarious playbour: Chinese migrant youth on the Kuaishou video-sharing platform. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 32(3), 322-340. https://doi.org/10.1177/10353046211037090
Zhou, Y., Lee, J. Y., & Liu, S. (2021). Research on the uses and gratifications of Tiktok (Douyin short video). International Journal of Contents, 17(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.5392/IJoC.2021.17.1.037
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The philosophy of the journal is to be open and to make all articles accessible. It is our belief that open access is a must in the future of science.
Authors who publish with RCR accept a slightly modified Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
You, as author, retain the copyrights for your paper, but the Review of Communication Research is granted exclusivity for publication of the article. The agreement allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and publication in this journal. We do not want third parties to make a commercial use of the article, unless we agree it with authors.
The journal will run an open review process as well as a traditional peer review process.
When the manuscript is accepted for publication, it will get a doi number and get available online to facilitate early citation.
The journal will post the published article to many public repositories for further diffusion and permanence.
You, as author, are permitted and encouraged to post your work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on your website), as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
If you have any doubts, please, contact the editor: editor@rcommunication.org
Many thanks for submitting your work to this journal.
