Hybrid Media Systems: Challenges and Opportunities for Modern Journalism

Authors

  • Alexandr Rozhkov Ph.D in Philology, Associate Professor of the Department UNESCO for Journalism and Communication, Faculty of Journalism, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan Author https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6158-5426

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52152/RCR.V12.6

Keywords:

Digital Technologies, Global Media Landscapes, Media Consumption, Journalism Evolution, Media Ecology

Abstract

This paper examines the implications of hybrid mass media for modern journalism, with a focus on the transformative effects of digital technologies and social media in political communication and public interaction. The study also investigates the concept of media ecology, emphasizing the importance of considering organizational structures and discursive elements alongside technology. It underscores the impact of technologies, such as algorithms used by Google and Facebook, on journalistic practices and content production. The paper introduces the concept of hybrid journalism, which utilizes various platforms and channels for disseminating information, emphasizing the importance of multimedia integration and audience interactivity. It also addresses the challenges of hybrid media, particularly the potential for spreading misinformation and propaganda. Additionally, the paper examines the influence of digital platform corporations in shaping public opinion, discussing the need for regulatory measures to address the risks associated with platform dominance. It proposes a reevaluation of the Media Concentration Law to effectively regulate platform opinion power. Finally, the paper presents a case study of Kazakhstan, highlighting its active embrace of digital technologies in media and open data. It provides a detailed overview of the digital media landscape in Kazakhstan, including social media usage, challenges in media freedom, and internet access infrastructure.

References

Altheide, D. L. (2013). Media logic, social control, and fear. Communication Theory. https://doi.org/10.1111/comt.12017

Bailey, R. (2018). When journalism and satire merge: The implications for impartiality, engagement and “Post-Truth” politics—A UK perspective on the serious side of US TV comedy. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 200-213.

Barnard, S. R. (2016). “Tweet or Be Sacked”: Twitter and the new elements of journalistic practice. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 17(2), 190-207.

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Carlson, M. (2016). Metajournalistic discourse and the meanings of journalism: Definitional control, boundary work, and legitimation. Communication Theory, 26(4), 349-368.

Castells, M., & van Dijk, J. (2013). Social media and social movements: The role of hybrid media in the Arab spring. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

Chadwick, A. (2017). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Chadwick, A., & Collister, S. (2014). Boundary-drawing power and the renewal of professional news organizations: The case of the Guardian and the Edward Snowden NSA leak. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2420-2441.

Davis, M., & Jurgens, J. (2017). The civic potential of hybrid media: Evidence from the UK. Southampton, UK: University of Southampton.

Deuze, M., & Witschge, T. (2018). Beyond journalism: Theorizing the transformation of journalism. Journalism, 19(2), 165-181.

Edgerly, S., & Vraga, E. K. (2019). News, entertainment, or both? Exploring audience perceptions of media genre in a hybrid media environment. Journalism, 20(6), 807-826.

European Commission. (2020). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the European democracy action plan COM/2020/790 final. Retrieved from https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2020:790:FIN

Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2017). Ten years after comparing media systems: What have we learned?. Political Communication, 34(2), 155-171.

Harcup, T., & O’Neill, D. (2016). What is news? News values revisited (again). Journalism Studies, 18(12), 1470-1488.

Hermida, A. (2016). Social media and the news. In T. Witschge, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, & C. W. Anderson. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism (pp. 81-94). London, UK: Sage.

Hiippala, T. (2017). The multimodality of digital longform journalism. Digital Journalism, 5(4), 420-442.

Kenyon, A. T. (2021). Democracy of expression: Positive free speech and law (vol. 1). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Lange, C., & Quiring, O. (2019). Hybrid media use in the United States. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

Mellado, C., Márquez-Ramírez, M., Van Leuven, S., Jackson, D., Mothes, C., Arcila-Calderón, C., . . . Viveros Aguilar, D. (2024). Comparing journalistic role performance across thematic beats: A 37-country study. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 101(1), 97-126.

Meraz, S., & Papacharissi, Z. (2016). Network framing and gatekeeping. In T. Witschge, A. Hermida, D. Domingo, & C. W. Anderson. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Digital Journalism (pp. 95-112). London, UK: Sage.

Naughton, J. (2018). Platform power and responsibility in the attention economy. In M. Moore & D. Tambini (Eds.), Digital Dominance: The Power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Nemitz, P., & Pfeffer, M. (2022). Determining our technological and democratic future: A wish list. In M. Moore & D. Tambini (Eds.), Regulating Big Tech: Policy Responses to Digital Dominance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Noam, E. M. (2021). Overcoming market power in online video platforms. In M. Moore & D. Tambini (Eds.), Regulating Big Tech: Policy Responses to Digital Dominance. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Padovani, C., & Calabrese, A. (2014). Communication rights and social justice: Historical accounts of transnational mobilizations. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Pasquale, F. (2020). New laws of robotics: Defending human expertise in the age of AI. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Patterson, T. E. (2016). News coverage of the 2016 general election: How the press failed the voters. Retrieved from https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/

Pew Research Center. (2020). News use across social media platforms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

Tambini, D. (2021). Media freedom. Medford, MA: Polity Press.

Trenz, H. J., & Strömbäck, J. (2018). Hybrid media: Political communication in the age of social media. Luxembourg, The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2018). The spread of misinformation on social media: Identifying, measuring, and mitigating the problem. Oxford, UK: Oxford Internet Institute.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-20

Issue

Section

Articles